The Precedent-Setting Component in Judicial Practices in the Russian Federation: Issues of Uniformity of Civil Law Enforcement

Introduction. At the current stage of development of social relationships, distinguishing the place and significance of judicial practices in the system of civil law sources in Russia is a pressing scientific problem. Although, Russian legal system formally refers to the Romano-Germanic legal family, which denies the precedent, the actual influence of the supreme judicial authorities’ judgements on law enforcement is beyond doubt. This happens due to the objective inability of the legislative power to promptly regulate the full diversity of emerging legal issues, which entails the growing role of judicial practices as a mechanism for dispute resolution and development of uniform approaches to the interpretation of legal norms. The aim of the article is to conduct a comprehensive analysis of the nature, features, and functions of judicial practices in the Russian Federation, as well as to assess the influence thereof on law enforcement. Particular attention has been paid to the issue of setting precedent elements in judicial practices and prospects for enhancing the enforcement mechanisms of civil law norms.

Materials and Methods. The research was based on the following sources: the acting civil law of the Russian Federation, judicial acts of the Constitutional and the Supreme Courts of the Russian Federation, reviews of court cases, and works of native Russian experts in the field of theory of state and law. The research was conducted using dialectical, dogmatic legal, systemic-structural, comparative legal methods, as well as the methods of analysis and synthesis.

Results. It has been ascertained that the value of judicial practices is not limited to simple aggregation of court judgments. Application of judicial practices ensures formation of the stable reference points for resolving similar legal cases, contributes to the uniformity of understanding the implications of legal norms and reduces the possibility of their contradictory interpretation. In fact, judgements of the supreme judicial authorities serve as a mechanism for specification of law enabling application of the abstract legal norms with respect to the specific circumstances of certain life situations. This fosters the stability of civil circulation, enhances legal certainty, and ensures more efficient protection of the subjective rights of the parties to the civil law relationships. Judicial practices are particularly valuable due to the opportunity to reveal the substance of assessment categories, which allows the laws to be adapted to the constantly changing social relationships without issuing numerous amendments.

Discussion and Conclusion. The results of the study confirm that systematic application of judicial practices is an important condition for efficient enforcement of civil law, which doesn’t only eliminate the ambiguities in the interpretation of legal norms but also ensures uniformity in resolving cases of similar category. It seems expedient to continue research in determining the place of the supreme courts’ judgements in the system of civil law sources, because further refinement of this mechanism could enhance the efficiency of judicial protection and ensure greater stability of civil law relationships in Russia.

1. Ivanova SV, Rybak SV. The Role and Significance of the Principles of Faunal Law in Law Enforcement Practices in the Russian Federation. Legal Order and Legal Values. 2025;3(4):39-46. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.23947/2949-1843-2025-3-4-39-46

2. Lada AS. Problems of Uniform Interpretation and Application of Legal Norms in Judicial Acts in the Civil Process. In: Proceedings of the All-Russian Scientific and Practical Conference “Judicial Acts in Civil Proceedings: Problems of Theory, Legislation and Judicial Practice”. Saint Petersburg: Centr Nauchno-Informacionnyh Tehnologij “Asterion”, LLC; 2025. P. 48–55. (In Russ.)

3. Lusegenova ZS, Linkin VN. Judicial Practice as a Legal Institution. North Caucasus Legal Vestnik. 2024;(3):136–143. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22394/2074-7306-2024-1-3-136-143

4. Ryzhkov KS. Classification of Legal Means to Ensure Uniformity of Judicial Practice in Civil Cases. Vestnik Tverskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Pravo (Bulletin of Tver State University. Series: Law). 2025;(2(82)):30–40. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26456/vtpravo/2025.2.030

5. Melkonyan VG. Judicial Practice as a Key Element of the Principle of the Unity of Judicial Practice: A Theoretical and Legal Analysis. Legal Science. 2025;(5):34–36. (In Russ.)

6. Dobush DV, Krasnyakov NI. The Social and Legal Nature of Judicial Precedent in Legal System of Society. Territory Development. 2017;(2(8)):40–44. (In Russ.)

7. Balyakin AA. Problems of Institutional and Procedural Independence of Arbitration Courts in Modern Russia. Molodoj uchenyj (Young Scientist). 2026;(20(623)):463–466. (In Russ.)

8. Belousova MN. The Place of Judicial Precedent and Judicial Practice in Civil Proceedings. Vestnik nauki (Science Bulletin). 2023;3(4(61)):95–102. (In Russ.)

9. Akhmetova AT, Bakiev AA. The Importance of Judicial Practice in Civil Law. In: Collection of Scientific Articles “Current Issues of Jurisprudence”. Sterlitamak: Ufa University of Science and Technology; 2025. P. 16–19. (In Russ.)

10. Khabieva ZD. The Importance of Judicial Practice for the Development of Civil Law. Agrarian and Land Law. 2025;(9):333–335. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.47643/1815-1329_2025_9_333

11. Khamidova R. The Role of Constitutional Law in Ensuring Individual Rights and Freedoms in Civil Society: Analysis of Legislation and Judicial Practice. Actual Problems of Science and Practice. 2024;(3(36)):73–75. (In Russ.)

12. Chipchigina AV. The Role of Judicial Practice in the Development of Civil Law. In: Proceedings of the X National Scientific and Practical Conference (Symposium) “Private Law of the Russian Federation: History, Current State, Trends and Development Prospects”. Krasnodar: Research Institute of Actual Problems of Modern Law; 2025. P. 216–219. (In Russ.)

13. Komarov DN. Principles of Civil Procedure: The Concept, Classification and Ways of Expression. Proceedings of Southwest State University. Series: History and Law. 2025;15(4):162–174. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21869/2223-1501-2025-15-4-162-174

14. Oganesyan SM, Martirosyan TKh. The Importance of Judicial Practice in Regulating Civil Law Relations. In: Proceedings of the National Scientific and Practical Conference “Management of Socio-Economic Development: Innovative and Strategic Approaches”. Gatchina: State Institute of Economics, Finance, Law and Technology; 2024. P. 425–427. (In Russ.)

15. Zhenetl SZ. The Problem of Legislative Regulation of Judicial Discretion in the Civil Proceedings. Rossijskoe pravosudie (Russian Justice). 2024;(8):41–53. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.37399/issn2072-909X.2024.8.41-53